Education – Intermediate/Senior

2024-2025 - UG - Major Program Modification (Modify Existing Calendar Entry)

completed

What can I do next?

View the Proposal

  • View changes to the proposal by clicking the Discussion tab and selecting "Show current with markup" on the User Tracking dropdown.
  • View current comments concerning this proposal by clicking the Discussion tab.
  • View the history of the proposal by clicking the Workflow Status tab.
  • View the signatures the proposal has collected by clicking the Signatures tab.
  • View the files associated with the proposal by clicking the Files tab.
  • Compare the proposal with related proposal by clicking the Proposal Lookup tab.
(A) Proposal summary
  • STEP 1 - Complete the proposal summary information
  • Home faculty*
    Choose your faculty from the list of available options.
  • Content type*
    Choose the type of content imported from the calendar. Contact ciqe@ontariotechu.ca if you require assistance.
  • Summary of proposed changes*

    Concurrent Education: 

    1. Increase the quality of candidates entering the Bachelor of Education (“the Program”) through the Concurrent pathway. 
      1. Increase the cumulative GPA required for Concurrent Education admission to 3.5 (proposed), from 3.0 (current). 
    2. Addition of four prerequisites for Concurrent Education students. 
      1. EDST 1000U – Foundations of Learning
      2. EDST 2110U – Assessment for Learning
      3. Two additional EDST courses of their choice.

    Increased GPA to Remain in the Bachelor of Education: 

    1. Retain quality teacher candidates by increasing the GPA requirements for program continuation from “B- (70%) overall average” to “achieve a B (73-76%) in each Bachelor of Education course”.

    Program Delivery Modifications to 12 Courses: 

    1. Increase flexibility for students, faculty, and logistics by reclassifying the delivery mode of 12 courses (3 core, 9 elective) from in-class only to hybrid, as outlined in the Delivery Method spreadsheet attached.

    Editorial updates to General program information sections.

     

    Include a brief point by point summary of the changes included in this proposal.
  • Is a new course associated with this proposal?*
    Select 'yes' only if you are adding a brand new course to the calendar copy in this proposal.
  • If applicable, list new course codes, course titles and include hyperlinks to course proposals in Curriculog in the 'new courses' field below. To hyperlink, open a new window and search for the new course proposal in Curriculog. Copy the url from your web browser, return to this form and select the hyper link icon. Paste the url into the url field and save.

  • New courses
  • Calendar start date*
    Choose when the change should appear in the Academic Calendar.
  • Registration start date*
    Specify the first active term (e.g., Fall 2019).
  • STEP 2 - Attach supporting documents, if applicable
  • Visit the files section of the toolbox on the right-hand side of the form to attach any supporting documentation.

  • Are you attaching any supporting documents*
(B) Program information
  • STEP 3 - Complete program modifications in Section B
  • Program or shared core name*
    Education Intermediate/Senior
    Education Intermediate/Senior
    This is the title of the program or shared core in the calendar.
  • Program type
  • Degree type
  • Note: If the program or shared core description does not import into the field below, it is captured in the calendar copy. In this case, do not add content to the program or shared core description field as it will import to the calendar. Admission requirements should be captured in the calendar copy.

  • Program or shared core description
  • Calendar copy*
  • Program structure
    Describe any experiential or other applied learning opportunities that are part of the program component.
  • Note: Program learning outcomes will not import from the calendar. If you are making changes to this field, please enter the current information now and make changes only after you have validated and launched the proposal.

    If you do not have a recent version of your programs learning outcomes and alignment with the Degree Level Expectations, or would like to make a modification to them, please contact ciqe@ontariotechu.ca

  • Program learning outcomes
(C) Detailed proposal information
  • STEP 4 - Complete Section C
  • Introduction
  • Brief background on existing program*

    The Bachelor of Education (Intermediate/Senior) is a teacher education program consisting of 60 credit hours and a minimum of 80 field experience placement days across four consecutive semesters. In addition to our innovative programming, our program offers two unique characteristics: one fully-online semester, modelling effective education in a virtual environment, and the ability to complete the program and enter the profession one semester earlier than most other teacher education programs. Successful completion of the program results in students’ recommendation to the Ontario College of Teachers for official certification, and preferential admission into the Master of Education program. 

    The last significant change to the BEd program took place in 2015, when the Ontario Ministry of Education required universities to double the length of their teacher education programs from two semesters to four.

     

  • Rationale for the modification*

    Pressures on Current Program Structure:  

    1. Budgetary need to increase enrolment.
      1. Goal of increasing enrolment by 60% (from 406 to 650) by 2026. 

    Proposed Solution: 

    • Modifying the delivery method of select courses (as indicated above) will reduce the physical space needs of the program, allowing for the creation of additional course sections to accommodate program growth without conflicting with building infrastructure.
    • We anticipate that the flexibility offered by increased hybrid and fully-online course options will have a positive impact on student retention.

    Pressures on Current Infrastructure: 

    1. Lack of adequate classroom availability to accommodate enrolment targets (and resultant increase of course sessions required). 
      1. Following the closure of the 11 Simcoe St. N. building, the Mitch and Leslie Frazer Faculty of Education (“the Faculty”) has amalgamated with the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities across Charles Hall, Bordessa Hall, and the Regent Theatre. This has resulted in substantial scheduling challenges, often requiring that the Faculty seek space off-site to host student events, meetings, and classes (e.g., Health and Physical Education). 
      2. Pressures to increase enrollment across the university will further exacerbate scheduling challenges across Downtown Campus facilities during current program hours. 

    Proposed Solution: 

    • Modifying the delivery method of select courses (as indicated above) will reduce the physical space needs of the program, allowing for the creation of additional course sections to accommodate program growth without conflicting with building infrastructure.

    Demonstrated Need for Program Flexibility: 

    1. Requests from prospective students to offer alternative program delivery. 
      1. Following the temporary transition to online teaching and learning during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Faculty has received an influx of requests for alternative course scheduling, including online offerings. 
      2. Prospective students have indicated that alternative program scheduling could address several needs, including but not limited to: 
        1. Lack of high-quality teacher education in their geographic region. 
        2. Maintaining current employment while attending school. 
        3. Balancing education with personal and familial responsibilities. 

    Proposed Solution: 

    • Increasing the number of courses offering a hybrid or fully-online delivery model will provide much-needed flexibility for students, particularly those who live a considerable distance from Ontario Tech or have other considerations that would benefit from the opportunity to learn from home. 
    • Modifying the delivery method of a select number of courses at this time will allow for the development of institutional best practices to inform future shifts in course delivery (as approved by the Ontario College of Teachers). 

    Reputation Management and Program Quality:

    1. The Faculty is willing and ready to expand its enrollment. However, we are equally mindful of the need to uphold our favourable reputation and attract quality candidates. 
      1. In recent years, the Faculty has observed an upwards trend of challenges related to students’ demonstration of the Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession. 
      2. To ensure that the Faculty maintains a positive reputation for academic excellence, a supportive learning environment, and the development of exceptional teachers and leaders, we aspire to attract students aligned with our values and vision.

    Proposed Solution: 

    • Increasing the minimum GPA required for Concurrent Education students to transition to the Bachelor of Education from 3.0 (current) to 3.5 (proposed) will increase the likelihood that candidates are (a) capable of effectively managing a demanding workload, and (b) committed to academic excellence. 
    1. The Faculty appreciates the diversity of students’ experience and subject expertise attracted via the Concurrent program, but has observed a gap in understanding related to foundations of education. 

    Proposed Solution: 

    • In collaboration with the Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Educational Studies program, the Faculty will require students enrolled in Concurrent education to complete a minimum of four Educational Studies courses as part of their undergraduate programming. Pre-requisite courses will include: 
      • EDST 1000U – Foundations of Learning
      • EDST 2110U – Assessment for Learning 
      • Two EDST courses of their choice.
    How will this change or enhance the program and/or opportunities for students and graduates?
  • Fit with the mission, mandate, strategic plans of the University, and the broader array of program offerings.*

    The proposed modifications align with the Faculty’s vision to “graduate exceptional teachers who will truly make a difference and become educational leaders.” By adding a minimum of four pre-requisite courses in Educational Studies and increasing the GPA required for Concurrent Education students to transition into the Bachelor of Education, we expect to see an increase in the quality of teacher candidates. In addition, we hope to reduce the incidence of high quality candidates exiting the program as a result of scheduling imbalances. 

    The proposed modifications also align with Ontario Tech University’s strategic priorities. Specifically, modifications to course delivery methods (as outlined above) represent our commitment to “learning re-imagined”. Recognizing that (a) the province of Ontario is not without online education options for K-12 students (e.g., Learn at Home, DDSB@Home), and (b) co-location is not a condition of effective teacher education, the Faculty endeavours to extend our hybrid and fully-online offerings to not only grow the program, but also to continue modelling best educational practices across face-to-face and virtual contexts. Similarly, Ontario Tech’s “inclusion” and “innovation” are well-represented in our proposal. The current program arrangement (with over 75% of the program components delivered exclusively in person) deters and disadvantages students without certain privileges such as consistent access to a vehicle, proximity to campus, unconditional childcare, etc. Offering a wider range of courses hybrid or fully-online promotes equity and inclusion for students whose circumstances prevent daily travel to campus. In addition, our proposed modifications are in line with both the Faculty’s and University’s drive for innovation. The Mitch and Leslie Frazer Faculty of Education is proficient in creating engaging, interactive online programming, and has done so for over 15 years. Drawing on these skills, we aim to be leaders of innovation in teacher education by providing effective, high-quality courses in both hybrid and online formats beginning with the courses identified above

     

    Description of how the proposed modifications fit into the broader array of program offerings, particularly those areas of teaching and research strengths, and complementary areas of study.
  • Resource requirements
  • Faculty members*

    At present, the Program is facilitated by: 

    • 70% Sessional Instructors
    • 15% Limited-Term Faculty Members
    • 10% Teaching Faculty
    • 5% Tenured Faculty

    In the short-term, no additional faculty are needed for implementation of this proposal.

     

    List of core faculty associated with the program, including appointment status, home unit, areas of teaching and research interests, and any new faculty requirements and gaps they would be expected to fill.
  • Additional academic and non-academic human resources*

    At present, no additional human resources are required to implement the proposed changes.

    Details of any administrative requirements, including support staff, adjunct and part-time faculty, supervision of experiential learning opportunities, and any other additional academic and non-academic human resources.
  • Physical resource requirements*

    No additional physical resource requirements needed.

    Details of any physical resource requirements, including library holdings, information technology support and student services, special equipment, and space requirements (classrooms, laboratory, graduate student work/study space, other).
  • Business plan
  • Statement of funding requirements*

    No additional funding requirements.

    A summary statement of the funding required to support the modification, including projected enrolments, start-up and continuing costs, if applicable.
  • Statement of resource/funding availability*

    NA

    Statements attesting to the adequacy of resources to support the modification from Deans who may have faculty members involved in or are contributing resources, the Registrar or the Dean of Graduate Studies, the Chief Librarian and the Provost.
  • Transition plan
  • Transition plan*

    The proposed changes would take effect Fall 2024. 

    Instructional Delivery Changes: 

    As part of the standard communications preceding Fall course registration, students will be informed about the change in delivery method for the aforementioned courses. This change in delivery would be reflected in the course registration system and students’ timetables via the appropriate code.

    To ease current scheduling challenges and avoid reserving classroom space unnecessarily, hybrid courses will share space in the timetable.

    Concurrent Education Changes:

    Students presently enrolled in the Concurrent Education program will not be affected by this transition. These students would be required to maintain the competitive average stated in their acceptance letter. The increased GPA requirement and pre-requisite courses would only apply to students applying to Concurrent Education following the implementation of these changes. 

    Letters of acceptance into the Concurrent Education program will be modified to reflect the updated GPA required for transition into the Bachelor of Education. These letters will also contain the text above, stating that students must complete the requisite Educational Studies (EDST) courses prior to program completion, with a recommendation to meet with their first-year advisor to design a program map that will enable them to meet program requirements. 

    Program GPA Changes: 

    Students who were enrolled in the Bachelor of Education prior to the implementation of these changes will not be affected. This cohort of students will be in their final semester, and will be expected to complete the program requirements as previously stated. 

    Letters of acceptance into the Bachelor of Education program for Fall 2024 will be updated to reflect the updated expectations around attaining a B (73 - 76%) in each course of the program.

     

    Semester (e.g. Fall 2020) for the implementation of the proposed changes; include a plan for all current students in the program, by year level. If this change impacts students that are not new and/or first-year students as of the start date, then a transition plan is required.
  • Converting to online options
  • Does this proposal contain any intended conversion of program components to online options? If yes, please complete the remaining items below*
  • Adequacy of technological platform

    These changes are employing existing platforms, tools  and supports currently in use by the faculty and in the program.

    Describe the adequacy of the technological platform to be used for online delivery
  • Maintenance of and/or changes to program-level learning outcomes

    Not impacted

    Describe how the current program-level learning outcomes will be maintained and/or changed when moving to online delivery.
  • Maintenance of and/or changes to program objectives

    Not impacted.

    Describe how the current program objectives will be maintained and/or changed when moving to online delivery.
  • Maintenance of and/or changes to the quality of education

    The proposed modification to course delivery will benefit students without regular access to transportation or those with personal and/or familial commitments that make daily commutes to campus challenging. Tools and technologies to minimize barriers to learning will also be more readily accessible.

    Describe how the quality of education will be maintained and/or changed when moving to online delivery.
  • Sufficiency of support services and training for teaching staff

    In anticipation of the changes, beginning in the Spring/Summer 2024 term instructors will be directed to resources and professional development workshops from the Teaching and Learning Centre, and other supports as available, to facilitate best practices in online education. 

    During syllabus preparation, instructors of overlapping courses will be supported by the administrative team to coordinate days on-campus as needed for effective program delivery. Instructors will also be invited to participate in professional learning communities for peer support in developing effective learning activities, assessments, and teaching resources for hybrid and/or online instruction. 

    Describe the support services and training for teaching staff that will be made available when moving to online delivery.
  • Sufficiency and type of support for students in the new learning environment

    These changes are employing existing platforms, tools  and supports currently in use by the faculty and in the program.

    Describe the sufficiency and type of supports that will be available to students when moving to online delivery.
  • Other
  • Additional supporting information, if applicable
    Describe any additional information needed to support the proposal.
(D) Impact and consultation
  • STEP 5 - Complete Section D
  • We have consulted with all impacted areas*
    By selecting 'yes', you agree that you have consulted with all affected areas prior to beginning this proposal. Select 'N/A' only if the change(s) do not involve students, staff and faculty from other programs or courses.
  • Process of consultation*

    Alternate Course Delivery Methods: 

    Over the last several years, the Faculty has seen an influx in requests from both current and prospective students for flexible course offerings. These have inspired numerous conversations with program instructors to determine what courses are best suited for online delivery. 

    The Faculty has also been in ongoing conversations with personnel in charge of scheduling regarding the increasing pressure on the downtown campus.

    Increasing Concurrent GPA: 

    As a professional program, the Bachelor of Education is demanding. Conversations with faculty and staff throughout the program have identified that students entering the program with a higher undergraduate GPA tend to experience greater success in their classes and field experience placements, and fewer challenges transitioning to the increased demands. 

    Discussions with representatives from the Registrar’s Office have also revealed that the admissions average for Concurrent Education has historically varied by time of year: September has been the most competitive, while students applying for January or May undergraduate start dates have been admitted with substantially lower GPAs. To make the admissions process more equitable and improve the conditions for student success once they are in the program, the Faculty has proposed an increase to the GPA required for admission to Concurrent Education. 

    Addition of EDST Prerequisites for Concurrent Students: 

    Meeting with the Faculty’s Academic Planning Officer, the Director of the Program (Christian Elia) and Dean (Robin Kay) were assured that most faculties’ (with the possible exception of the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science) program maps could accommodate the addition of four elective courses from the Educational Studies as pre-requisites for the Concurrent program. 

    The BEd administrative team also met with stakeholders of the Educational Studies program to ensure that courses would have sufficient space for Concurrent students. 

    Informal conversations with academic advising revealed that students felt it would be beneficial to take Faculty of ED courses before entry to the BEd to familiarize themselves with the faculty, education topics and courses.

    Increasing GPA for Students in the BEd:

    The Faculty is engaged in ongoing discussions with faculty members, program directors, etc. related to supporting student success. Concern has continually been expressed about students’ ability to achieve the currently listed 70% overall GPA without necessarily meeting all program requirements (e.g., poor performance in certain courses being offset by exceptional performance in others). Adjusting the requirement such that students must achieve a B in each individual course will help ensure that the minimum program requirements are being met.

    Feedback from Academic Advising revealed that students have also indicated that it would be beneficial as this keeps them on track with their program progression and meeting their professional standards for placement. Having different expectations for each course was more problematic and having it the same across the board is easier to manage.

     

    Must include ways in which student feedback was collected; also include process of consultation with other units if the change(s) involve(s) students, staff, and/or faculty from other programs or courses.
  • Are there any considerations for the principles of equity, diversity, inclusion or decolonization included with this program change?*
  • Please explain:*

    There are no changes to program content with this program change. Courses will continue to represent a diversity of perspectives and narratives as they relate to educational history, theory, and practice. 

    Accessibility has, and will continue, to inform the Faculty’s program decisions. The proposed modifications to course delivery will benefit students without regular access to transportation or those with personal and/or familial commitments that make daily commutes to campus challenging. Similarly, for students who depend on public transit, this series of changes will help to reduce total commute time and expenses. Tools and technologies to minimize barriers to learning will also be more readily accessible, such as built-in captioning in Zoom or Google Meet, screen reader technology for digital platforms, etc. 

    Increasing the GPA required for Concurrent Education students to transition into the Bachelor of Education program will enhance the accessibility of the program in several ways. Not only will admitting students with a stronger academic background ensure that the program can provide higher-quality education, the level of preparedness and academic fluency required to achieve the proposed GPA will enhance the likelihood of student success and reduce rates of withdrawal, resulting in a smoother academic journey. The program will continue to monitor students’ progress in their classes in order to intervene and connect with support services as needed to ensure their continued success. 

    The Faculty already carefully considers the principles of Universal Design in preparation of its courses, materials and resources, etc., and that consideration will extend to the redesign of any course components as a result of the modified delivery method.

     

    Does the program contain concepts, materials or resources from scholars/professionals who are part of one or more historically marginalized groups? Are multiple perspectives represented in the program, such as those offered by those who are Indigenous, Black, Persons of Colour and/or 2SLGBTQIA+? How has accessibility been considered? More specifically, have the needs of students with disabilities been integrated into the program design (e.g., the ways that students are asked to demonstrate their learning)? Will this program provide space to allow for the discussion of other viewpoints outside the dominant, Western narrative? Have the principles of Universal Design been considered?
  • Indigenous Content and Consultation
  • Does this change include any Indigenous content?*
  • For more information on how Indigenous content is defined at Ontario Tech University and how to consult with the Indigenous Education Advisory Circle, please refer to the Protocol for Consultation with the Indigenous Education Advisory Circle.

  • Has the IEAC been contacted?
  • If Yes, when?
  • What was the advice you received from the IEAC? And, how has it been included in your proposal?
  • Did the IEAC ask you to return the proposal to them for review?
    If Yes, have they completed their review?
(E) Routing
  • STEP 6 - Enter routing information
  • Important note: it is imperative that you choose the correct routing path as it cannot be changed once a proposal has been launched. If you have made a routing error after launching the proposal, the proposal will be cancelled and a new proposal will be required. If you require assistance with routing, please contact ciqe@ontariotechu.ca.

    Please note that changes to joint or collaborative programs do require approval at Faculty Council of each faculty involved in the program. You do not need to include other faculties in the routing, however, consultation with other faculties should be noted and any required approval by other Faculty Councils (and date of approval) should be noted in the comments section as approval is logged on the home Faculty Council step.

  • Should this proposal be routed to the Program Approval step prior to Curriculum Committee?*
    If your curriculum committee is organized by program, or if program-level approval prior to curriculum committee is not required, select 'no'.
  • Faculty or program-level group*
    Choose your faculty or program-level group from the list of options. If your faculty has program-level committees, choose the corresponding program group from the list. Otherwise, choose the home faculty. You may choose more than one option, but please note that your proposal will go to the committees of all options selected. The proposal will not move on to the next step until all faculties have approved at their respective committees. Note: If you are making a change for a Bachelor of Engineering program in FESNS, you must select both the Faculty of Energy Systems and Nuclear Science, and the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science from the list of options.
  • Is this change for a Bachelor of Engineering program or program which requires Engineering Curriculum Committee approval?*
  • Are there departments associated with your faculty?*
(F) End of proposal
  • STEP 7 - Save and ensure all required fields are complete
  • STEP 8 - Validate and launch proposal
  • STEP 9 - Review program modifications
  • To view the proposal with mark-up, navigate to the discussion section of the toolbox on the right-hand side of the form and change the User-Tracking setting to Show current with mark-up. To view the calendar copy with mark-up, click the Preview Curriculum icon and then the red pencil icon.

  • STEP 10 - Approve proposal
  • As the originator, you must approve the proposal to send it on to the next step. To approve, navigate to the decisions section of the toolbox on the right-hand side of the form.

(G) CIQE use only
  • Program or shared core OID
    16730
    16730
  • Code
  • User Tracking

    Help: Show Original: This option displays the proposal as it appeared at launch. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current: This option displays the proposal as it appears currently. No markup will be visible on the form. There will be no differentiation between fields that contain imported content and content that was created or selected by the originator by hand.

    Help: Show Current with Markup: This option displays the proposal with all of its current content marked to show different editors. Text fields that include imported content are indicated by a blue highlight, and may also include additional changes within, indicated by each editor’s unique color. Fields containing selects, checkboxes, radio buttons, or widgets (such as the curriculum) provide an activity log above the field, indicating each editor’s selection and unique color.

    Comments

    You have not saved your changes to all the assessment fields you edited. You have the following options:

    • Click "Save All Changes" now to save every change you made
    • Click "Abandon Changes" to destroy all unsaved changes
    • Click "Cancel" to continue working on assessments and save each field individually

    What would you like to do?

      You must be logged in, in order to approve.

      Please upload the form that you just printed and signed.

      This will be used as your signature to sign this proposal upon approval.


      Listed below are the symbols and colors utilized in Curriculum:

      • = has not made a decision
      • = approved
      • = rejected
      • = held
      • = suspended
      • = cancelled
      • = multiple decisions
      • = task
      • = mine
      • = stuck
      • = urgent, out of date import source
      x

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}

      x
      warning

      #{title}

      #{text}